Moreover, governments and companies using such metals should prioritize reducing demand for virgin supply (with enhanced recycling, for example) rather than expanding supply.<\/p>\n
WHAT IS DEEP-SEA MINING?<\/strong><\/h2>\nDeep-sea mining refers to three distinct, but related, industries defined by the types of ore targeted for exploitation: hydrothermal vents\u2019 massive sulfides, the cobalt-rich crusts of seamounts, and polymetallic nodules found on abyssal plains. These metals are commonly used in electric vehicle batteries and other technologies.<\/p>\n
Seafloor massive sulfides<\/strong> are small, discrete, ore-bearing structures produced by hydrothermal venting. Their deposits are rich in gold, nickel, copper, and other metals. Hydrothermal vents host the iconic ecosystems whose discovery fundamentally altered our understanding of what it means to be a living organism on Earth \u2013 that life forms and entire ecosystems can exist in the absence of sunlight (Thaler and Amon, 2019<\/a>). Even inactive vents host unique communities that are wholly distinct from the surrounding seafloor (Erickson et al., 2009<\/a>).<\/p>\nCobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts<\/strong> accrete on the surfaces of seamounts, forming the substrate to which habitat-building marine life adheres. These crusts are also enriched in other metals and rare-earth elements (Schlalcher et al., 2014<\/a>). These underwater mountains are home to colonies of corals and sponges; they support an abundant food web and provide critical habitat for fish and marine mammals and more.<\/p>\nMining these substrates is, in effect, a comprehensive removal of the ecosystem associated with each deposit. Seafloor production tools grind down the ore body, reducing the deposit to a slurry of sediment and small nodules which can be pumped to the surface via a riser and lift system for later processing on land (Van Dover, 2014<\/a>; ). Because the ore body is<\/i> the habitat, all proposed methods for mining these deposits also destroy the overlying ecosystem.<\/p>\nPolymetallic nodules<\/strong>, or manganese nodules, in comparison, are distributed across the abyssal plain, an immense flat part of the deep seafloor that covers 50% of the earth\u2019s surface. These nodules are formed as minerals in seawater precipitate out onto hard objects that have settled on the deep seafloor (the base is usually a small structure like the shell of a single-celled algae but can be objects as large as shark teeth). Nodules rest on the surface of the sediment in vast fields that can, at their densest, resemble a cobblestone path (Jones et al., 2021<\/a>). Endemic animals, like sponges, worms, and even corals, settle and grow on the nodules themselves, while the sediment underneath and the surrounding waters host similar life to the rest of the abyssal plain, including sea stars, sea cucumbers, and fish (Amon et al., 2016<\/a>).<\/p>\nMining polymetallic nodules involves a tank-like benthic crawler which travels across acres of abyssal plain, collecting nodules in large swaths while disturbing the first several inches of seafloor (Paulikas et al., 2020<\/a>). Nodules are then pumped, whole, to a surface vessel via a riser and lift system where they are prepared for downstream processing. Because the nodules are distributed across a much larger area than either vents or crusts and are more tightly associated with background abyssal benthic communities, more selective mining processes may eventually be possible.<\/p>\nFor all forms of deep-sea mining, ore processing occurs on land, using conventional methods, with all of the subsequent environmental impacts associated with industrial metal refining.<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t![\"\"](\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\")
<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tSeafloor massive sulfides are found at hydrothermal vent sites (image: NOAA). \n\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tCobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts build up on the surfaces of seamounts (image: Oceana). \n\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\tPolymetallic nodules are found on the abyssal plain (image: Philweb CC).\n\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n <\/p>\n
IMPACTS OF DEEP-SEA MINING<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe environmental impacts of deep-sea mining remain poorly understood and vary significantly depending on the ore being mined, but fall generally into the following five categories:<\/p>\n
Destruction of the Immediate Ecosystem<\/strong>
\nFor the life that grows on and around deep-sea mining prospects, destruction will be comprehensive. On both hydrothermal vents and cobalt-rich crusts, the ore is<\/i><\/strong> the habitat (Miller et al. 2018<\/a>). There is no way to mine the ore without killing the marine life attached to it. Polymetallic nodule mining will also be comprehensively destructive to any organisms that live directly on the nodules or in the surrounding sediment (Hein et al. 2020<\/a>), though because nodules occur across vast swaths of the abyssal plain, the overall impact to this deep-sea ecosystem may be less severe than the mining of vents and crusts (Niner et al. 2018<\/a>). Moreover, by removing complex structures and creating vehicle tracks and trenches, deep-sea mining changes the structure and topography of these ecosystems \u2013 which affects deep-water currents that are essential for dispersal and migration of many species (Gausepohl et al. 2020<\/a>; Girard et al. 2020<\/a>).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSediment Plumes<\/strong>
\nActivity from deep-sea mining will produce sediment plumes at the mining site as well as in the water column from discharge as the ore is dewatered aboard a surface ship (Spearman et al. 2020<\/a>). The mining plume has the potential to smother the organisms around the mining site and to spread from the immediate area out several kilometers. The deep sea ordinarily has slow-moving currents and naturally still, clear water so its organisms have evolved without the need or ability to \u201ccough\u201d up or clear sediment from their gills and feeding appendages. This cloud of dust can cause large scale disruption of seafloor ecosystems (Van Dover et al. 2017<\/a>). The mid-water discharge plume can extend from tens to thousands of kilometers, altering the natural chemical balance of the midwater and disrupting ecosystem function (Drazen et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\nNoise<\/strong>
\nDeep-sea mining is noisy. Collector vehicles crawl across the seafloor, bringing light and vibration as well. Riser and lift systems pump a slurry of ore to the surface. Vessels sit \u201con station\u201d for months. The natural deep abyssal soundscape is consistent and quiet (Chen et al. 2021<\/a>), but the noise within 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) of a mining site could exceed 120 decibels, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service threshold for behavioral impacts to marine mammals (Williams et al. 2022<\/a>). Noise produced by the riser and lift system as well as the surface vessel can have unpredictable impacts on mid-water and pelagic communities. This noise can cause stress, interfere with communication and feeding, and cause emigration of marine animals, destabilizing ecosystems (Drazen et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\nToxicity<\/strong>
\nThe ores contain metals that are not harmful in their typical state but can become more toxic during the mineral extraction process. New research also shows polymetallic nodules are highly radioactive \u2013 containing radiation concentrations as much as 1,000 times above what\u2019s considered safe (Volz et al. 2023<\/a>). Nodule processing would crush them up and could release a fraction of these particles into the air and could be breathed in during the operation. Once the slurry is discharged back into the ocean, the radioactive and toxic metals could poison the immediate surroundings or even spread through currents to adjacent ecosystems and up the food chain through bioaccumulation\u200b (Hauton et al., 2017<\/a>)\u200b.<\/p>\nSpatial Conflict<\/strong>
\nThough often out of public view, deep-sea mining poses several potential resource conflicts. Cobalt-rich crusts occur on seamounts which also act as nursery grounds and aggregation sites for commercially important fish species, placing deep-sea mining in direct competition with commercial fishing (van der Grient and Drazen, 2021<\/a>. Other issues include overlap with subsea telecommunications cables, as well as cultural conflicts (Turner et al. 2019<\/a>), such as co-occurrence with traditional Polynesian and Melanesian voyaging routes and the Middle Passage, a maritime graveyard for over 2 million men, women, and children kidnapped from Africa and drowned during the Atlantic slave trade (Turner et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULATING DEEP-SEA MINING?<\/strong><\/h2>\nWhile coastal states have jurisdiction and exclusive rights over seabed resources within their exclusive economic zone (EEZ) (UNCLOS, 1982<\/a>; ISA, 2019<\/a>), the United Nations established the International Seabed Authority (ISA) to regulate mining on the high seas (UNCLOS, 1994<\/a>). The ISA is currently drafting the \u201cMining Code\u201d (or \u201cthe Code\u201d), a comprehensive set of rules to regulate prospecting, exploration, and exploitation. Though it was originally slated for completion by July 2020, the Code has yet to be finished.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIn June 2021, the island nation of Nauru notified the ISA of deep-sea mining plans to be carried out by Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI), a subsidiary of The Metals Company. The Metals Company, a Canada-based firm, is seeking to become the first to commercially mine polymetallic nodules in international waters. The proposed activity would take place in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the North Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and Mexico.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNauru\u2019s notification triggered the \u201ctwo-year rule,\u201d which stipulates that the ISA has two years to finalize mining regulations after a sponsor state has notified the ISA that a contractor plans to apply for the approval of a plan to begin mining. The two-year deadline passed in July 2023, but ISA member states agreed that commercial mining should not move forward in the absence of rules, regulations, and procedures relating to mineral exploitation (Tsioumanis, Asterios et al. 2025<\/a>). <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAt the ISA\u2019s most recent meeting in March 2025, member states continued work on the draft mining regulations but did not reach agreement on how to consider mining applications submitted before the Code is finalized or the timeline for completion (Tsioumanis, Asterios et al. 2025<\/a>).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThat same week, The Metals Company announced that its U.S. subsidiary plans to apply for a mining permit under U.S. law, outside the ISA process<\/span> (The Metals Company, 2025<\/a>)<\/span>. <\/span>T<\/span>he government of Nauru <\/span>also <\/span>reiterated its intention to <\/span>submit<\/span> a separate application to the ISA in June 2025 on behalf of NORI (<\/span>Tsioumanis<\/span><\/a> et al., 2025).<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nDeep-sea mining is unique in that it is the first global industry for which binding multilateral regulations are being developed prior to commercialization, presenting a rare opportunity to more fully understand and manage the potential environmental impacts before the first ton of ore leaves the seafloor. If done well, a robust regulatory framework informed by the best available scientific knowledge and guided by the precautionary principle might minimize harm to marine life. Oceana is calling for a moratorium on abyssal plain mining until such a framework is in place.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts<\/strong> accrete on the surfaces of seamounts, forming the substrate to which habitat-building marine life adheres. These crusts are also enriched in other metals and rare-earth elements (Schlalcher et al., 2014<\/a>). These underwater mountains are home to colonies of corals and sponges; they support an abundant food web and provide critical habitat for fish and marine mammals and more.<\/p>\n Mining these substrates is, in effect, a comprehensive removal of the ecosystem associated with each deposit. Seafloor production tools grind down the ore body, reducing the deposit to a slurry of sediment and small nodules which can be pumped to the surface via a riser and lift system for later processing on land (Van Dover, 2014<\/a>; ). Because the ore body is<\/i> the habitat, all proposed methods for mining these deposits also destroy the overlying ecosystem.<\/p>\n Polymetallic nodules<\/strong>, or manganese nodules, in comparison, are distributed across the abyssal plain, an immense flat part of the deep seafloor that covers 50% of the earth\u2019s surface. These nodules are formed as minerals in seawater precipitate out onto hard objects that have settled on the deep seafloor (the base is usually a small structure like the shell of a single-celled algae but can be objects as large as shark teeth). Nodules rest on the surface of the sediment in vast fields that can, at their densest, resemble a cobblestone path (Jones et al., 2021<\/a>). Endemic animals, like sponges, worms, and even corals, settle and grow on the nodules themselves, while the sediment underneath and the surrounding waters host similar life to the rest of the abyssal plain, including sea stars, sea cucumbers, and fish (Amon et al., 2016<\/a>).<\/p>\n Mining polymetallic nodules involves a tank-like benthic crawler which travels across acres of abyssal plain, collecting nodules in large swaths while disturbing the first several inches of seafloor (Paulikas et al., 2020<\/a>). Nodules are then pumped, whole, to a surface vessel via a riser and lift system where they are prepared for downstream processing. Because the nodules are distributed across a much larger area than either vents or crusts and are more tightly associated with background abyssal benthic communities, more selective mining processes may eventually be possible.<\/p>\n For all forms of deep-sea mining, ore processing occurs on land, using conventional methods, with all of the subsequent environmental impacts associated with industrial metal refining.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The environmental impacts of deep-sea mining remain poorly understood and vary significantly depending on the ore being mined, but fall generally into the following five categories:<\/p>\n Destruction of the Immediate Ecosystem<\/strong> Sediment Plumes<\/strong> Noise<\/strong> Toxicity<\/strong> Spatial Conflict<\/strong> <\/p>\n While coastal states have jurisdiction and exclusive rights over seabed resources within their exclusive economic zone (EEZ) (UNCLOS, 1982<\/a>; ISA, 2019<\/a>), the United Nations established the International Seabed Authority (ISA) to regulate mining on the high seas (UNCLOS, 1994<\/a>). The ISA is currently drafting the \u201cMining Code\u201d (or \u201cthe Code\u201d), a comprehensive set of rules to regulate prospecting, exploration, and exploitation. Though it was originally slated for completion by July 2020, the Code has yet to be finished.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In June 2021, the island nation of Nauru notified the ISA of deep-sea mining plans to be carried out by Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI), a subsidiary of The Metals Company. The Metals Company, a Canada-based firm, is seeking to become the first to commercially mine polymetallic nodules in international waters. The proposed activity would take place in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the North Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and Mexico.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Nauru\u2019s notification triggered the \u201ctwo-year rule,\u201d which stipulates that the ISA has two years to finalize mining regulations after a sponsor state has notified the ISA that a contractor plans to apply for the approval of a plan to begin mining. The two-year deadline passed in July 2023, but ISA member states agreed that commercial mining should not move forward in the absence of rules, regulations, and procedures relating to mineral exploitation (Tsioumanis, Asterios et al. 2025<\/a>). <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n At the ISA\u2019s most recent meeting in March 2025, member states continued work on the draft mining regulations but did not reach agreement on how to consider mining applications submitted before the Code is finalized or the timeline for completion (Tsioumanis, Asterios et al. 2025<\/a>).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n That same week, The Metals Company announced that its U.S. subsidiary plans to apply for a mining permit under U.S. law, outside the ISA process<\/span> (The Metals Company, 2025<\/a>)<\/span>. <\/span>T<\/span>he government of Nauru <\/span>also <\/span>reiterated its intention to <\/span>submit<\/span> a separate application to the ISA in June 2025 on behalf of NORI (<\/span>Tsioumanis<\/span><\/a> et al., 2025).<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Deep-sea mining is unique in that it is the first global industry for which binding multilateral regulations are being developed prior to commercialization, presenting a rare opportunity to more fully understand and manage the potential environmental impacts before the first ton of ore leaves the seafloor. If done well, a robust regulatory framework informed by the best available scientific knowledge and guided by the precautionary principle might minimize harm to marine life. Oceana is calling for a moratorium on abyssal plain mining until such a framework is in place.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/oceana.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2023\/06\/hydrothermal_vents-1.jpg\")
<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t![\"\"](\"https:\/\/oceana.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2023\/06\/seamounts-2.jpg\")
<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t![\"\"](\"https:\/\/oceana.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2023\/06\/abyssal_plain-1.jpg\")
<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\tIMPACTS OF DEEP-SEA MINING<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\nFor the life that grows on and around deep-sea mining prospects, destruction will be comprehensive. On both hydrothermal vents and cobalt-rich crusts, the ore is<\/i><\/strong> the habitat (Miller et al. 2018<\/a>). There is no way to mine the ore without killing the marine life attached to it. Polymetallic nodule mining will also be comprehensively destructive to any organisms that live directly on the nodules or in the surrounding sediment (Hein et al. 2020<\/a>), though because nodules occur across vast swaths of the abyssal plain, the overall impact to this deep-sea ecosystem may be less severe than the mining of vents and crusts (Niner et al. 2018<\/a>). Moreover, by removing complex structures and creating vehicle tracks and trenches, deep-sea mining changes the structure and topography of these ecosystems \u2013 which affects deep-water currents that are essential for dispersal and migration of many species (Gausepohl et al. 2020<\/a>; Girard et al. 2020<\/a>).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\nActivity from deep-sea mining will produce sediment plumes at the mining site as well as in the water column from discharge as the ore is dewatered aboard a surface ship (Spearman et al. 2020<\/a>). The mining plume has the potential to smother the organisms around the mining site and to spread from the immediate area out several kilometers. The deep sea ordinarily has slow-moving currents and naturally still, clear water so its organisms have evolved without the need or ability to \u201ccough\u201d up or clear sediment from their gills and feeding appendages. This cloud of dust can cause large scale disruption of seafloor ecosystems (Van Dover et al. 2017<\/a>). The mid-water discharge plume can extend from tens to thousands of kilometers, altering the natural chemical balance of the midwater and disrupting ecosystem function (Drazen et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n
\nDeep-sea mining is noisy. Collector vehicles crawl across the seafloor, bringing light and vibration as well. Riser and lift systems pump a slurry of ore to the surface. Vessels sit \u201con station\u201d for months. The natural deep abyssal soundscape is consistent and quiet (Chen et al. 2021<\/a>), but the noise within 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) of a mining site could exceed 120 decibels, the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service threshold for behavioral impacts to marine mammals (Williams et al. 2022<\/a>). Noise produced by the riser and lift system as well as the surface vessel can have unpredictable impacts on mid-water and pelagic communities. This noise can cause stress, interfere with communication and feeding, and cause emigration of marine animals, destabilizing ecosystems (Drazen et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n
\nThe ores contain metals that are not harmful in their typical state but can become more toxic during the mineral extraction process. New research also shows polymetallic nodules are highly radioactive \u2013 containing radiation concentrations as much as 1,000 times above what\u2019s considered safe (Volz et al. 2023<\/a>). Nodule processing would crush them up and could release a fraction of these particles into the air and could be breathed in during the operation. Once the slurry is discharged back into the ocean, the radioactive and toxic metals could poison the immediate surroundings or even spread through currents to adjacent ecosystems and up the food chain through bioaccumulation\u200b (Hauton et al., 2017<\/a>)\u200b.<\/p>\n
\nThough often out of public view, deep-sea mining poses several potential resource conflicts. Cobalt-rich crusts occur on seamounts which also act as nursery grounds and aggregation sites for commercially important fish species, placing deep-sea mining in direct competition with commercial fishing (van der Grient and Drazen, 2021<\/a>. Other issues include overlap with subsea telecommunications cables, as well as cultural conflicts (Turner et al. 2019<\/a>), such as co-occurrence with traditional Polynesian and Melanesian voyaging routes and the Middle Passage, a maritime graveyard for over 2 million men, women, and children kidnapped from Africa and drowned during the Atlantic slave trade (Turner et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\nWHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULATING DEEP-SEA MINING?<\/strong><\/h2>\n